Futurism, or the art of dancing on a volcano
Imagine Milan in 1910. A city in full metamorphosis, where factories belch black smoke into a sky crisscrossed with telegraph wires, where electric trams slice through the crowd with a shrill whistle, where workers in overalls cross paths with dandies in frock coats. It is against this backdrop of iron and soot that a group of artists, led by an eccentric poet with burning eyes, decide to burn down the museums and worship machines. Their creed? "A roaring automobile is more beautiful than the Winged Victory of Samothrace." Their name? The Futurists. Their weapon? Speed, noise, violence—and an aesthetic so radical it would shake the art of the 20th century.
By Artedusa
••7 min readFuturism is not just an artistic movement. It is a religion, a war, a collective madness. A desperate attempt to capture the frantic energy of a world spinning out of control, where the boundaries between man and machine blur, where the city becomes a living organism, where war is celebrated as "the world’s hygiene." But behind the thunderous manifestos and vibrant canvases lies a more complex story: that of a generation torn between the dream of a radiant future and the shadows of fascism, between formal innovation and political compromises.
Let us dive into this adventure where art becomes a weapon, where painting dances, where sculptures breathe—and where every work is a manifesto.
01The manifesto that shook Paris
On February 20, 1909, readers of Le Figaro discover, stunned, a fiery text signed by Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. "We want to sing the love of danger, the habit of energy and boldness," he proclaims. "We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed." The tone is set. This is not merely an artistic manifesto but a declaration of war against everything that smacks of the past: museums ("cemeteries"), libraries ("dormitories"), academies ("infirmaries").
To understand the impact of this text, one must imagine Europe at the time. A Europe still corseted in its Victorian conventions, where official art celebrates nymphs and ancient heroes, where bourgeois salons exhibit bucolic landscapes while factories devour the countryside. Marinetti, however, wants to blow it all up. His weapon? A mix of sound poetry, calculated provocation, and an almost mystical fascination with technology.
That very evening, Marinetti stages a performance at the Closerie des Lilas in Paris. He reads his manifesto before an audience of artists and critics, declaiming verses like "Zang tumb tumb"—an onomatopoeia meant to mimic the sound of cannons. The room is divided between nervous laughter and boos. Some see a genius, others a madman. But one thing is certain: Futurism is born, and it will not go unnoticed.
02When painting starts to run
If Marinetti is the prophet of Futurism, Umberto Boccioni is its high priest. This Milanese painter and sculptor, with his intense gaze and conquering mustache, gives the movement its visual dimension. And what a dimension! Imagine a canvas where forms are no longer static but in perpetual motion, where bodies dissolve into space, where light seems to burst from the objects themselves.
Take The City Rises (1910), one of his earliest Futurist works. At first glance, it is chaos: rearing horses, struggling workers, buildings that seem to melt under the pressure of invisible forces. But look closer. The diagonal lines, those famous linee di forza, cut across the canvas like lightning, creating a sense of centrifugal motion. The colors—blood reds, electric yellows, deep blues—vibrate with an almost physical intensity. Boccioni does not paint a city; he paints the energy of a city, its breath, its heartbeat.
And then there is Unique Forms of Continuity in Space (1913), the bronze sculpture that became the icon of Futurism. A human figure—or rather, what remains of one: a body decomposed, stretched, as if the wind of speed had shaped it. The legs are pistons, the arms wings, the torso an airplane fuselage. It is both a celebration of the modern body and a metaphor for its disintegration. "We want to give life to the object by showing its extension in space," Boccioni writes. Mission accomplished.
03Giacomo Balla, or the art of dissecting movement
If Boccioni is the visionary, Giacomo Balla is the scientist of the group. This Turinese artist with an angular face, a former Divisionist converted to Futurism, approaches painting like an equation to solve. How to represent speed? How to capture the invisible? For him, the answer lies in chronophotography, the technique that breaks down movement into a series of still images.
Take Dynamism of a Dog on a Leash (1912). A woman walks her dachshund. Nothing extraordinary, at first glance. But look at the dog’s legs: they are multiplied, as if the animal had eight limbs. The woman’s feet, too, seem to float above the ground. Balla does not paint a snapshot; he paints movement itself, superimposing several moments into a single image. It is a revolution. Until then, painting froze time. Balla makes it run.
And then there is Abstract Speed + Sound (1913-14), a canvas that pushes the logic even further. No dog, no woman, no landscape. Just geometric shapes colliding, lines intersecting, colors exploding. Balla has reduced speed to its essence: a vibration, pure energy. "Movement is life itself," he writes. In this painting, one can almost hear the roar of the engine, the whistle of the wind.
04War as a work of art
On May 24, 1915, Italy enters the war. For the Futurists, it is the opportunity to put their theories into practice. Marinetti, who had written that "war is the world’s only hygiene," enlists as a volunteer. Boccioni, too, joins the army—and dies the following year, not in combat, but during a routine cavalry exercise. His death marks a turning point. Futurism loses its genius, and the movement begins to fracture.
Gino Severini, the most Parisian of the Futurists, embodies this ambiguity. In 1915, he paints Armored Train in Action, a canvas that blends Cubism and Futurism to celebrate war. Geometric forms clash, cannons spew fire, soldiers merge with metal. It is both a work of art and a propaganda tool. But after the war, Severini distances himself from the movement. "I painted that out of patriotism," he will say later. "But I was wrong."
Carlo Carrà goes further. After painting The Funeral of the Anarchist Galli (1911), a chaotic canvas where the angry crowd seems ready to sweep everything away, he turns away from Futurism toward metaphysical painting. As if the violence he had celebrated had finally caught up with him.
05The poisoned legacy
In the 1920s, Futurism transforms. Marinetti, now close to Mussolini, makes it the official art of fascism. Manifestos multiply: Manifesto of Aeropainting (1929), Manifesto of Futurist Cuisine (1930)—the latter proposing dishes as absurd as "soft-boiled eggs with a broth of nails." Some artists, like Balla, resist. Others, like Tullio Crali, embrace the new aesthetic with enthusiasm, painting diving planes and futuristic cities.
But the heart is no longer in it. Futurism, which had been a movement of rupture, becomes a propaganda tool. Its formal innovations—the decomposition of movement, dynamic abstraction—are taken up by other currents, from Russian Constructivism to Art Deco. But its soul is lost along the way.
Yet its influence persists. In the design of the 1930s, where aerodynamic lines evoke speed. In science fiction cinema, where futuristic cities owe much to the drawings of Antonio Sant’Elia. In electronic music, where industrial sounds recall Luigi Russolo’s intonarumori. And even in contemporary art, where artists like Olafur Eliasson or Carsten Höller explore, in their own way, the relationship between man and machine.
06Futurism today: a lesson in speed and vertigo
What remains of Futurism, a century after its heyday? An aesthetic, of course—those dynamic forms, those electric colors, that obsession with speed. But also a more troubling question: what happens when art becomes a weapon? When the celebration of modernity turns into an apology for violence?
Futurism reminds us that the avant-garde is not always synonymous with progress. That innovation can hide compromises. That the beauty of speed can lead to vertigo, even to the fall.
Yet there is something fascinating in this collective madness. In this desperate attempt to capture the energy of a changing world. In this naive and touching conviction that art can change life.
So the next time you see a sports car speeding down a highway, or hear the roar of an airplane in the sky, remember: somewhere, in 1910, a group of Italian artists tried to paint that noise, that speed, that intoxication. And they almost succeeded.